The biggest US single-family landlord will pay $49.75 million over fees that added $30 to $330 a month, FTC says

Progress Residential, the country's largest property manager of single-family rental homes, and its private equity owner, Pretium Partners, have agreed to pay $49.75 million to settle charges that they deceived renters about the true cost of their homes. The Federal Trade Commission called it the largest enforcement action it has ever taken against a landlord. Arizona, Colorado, Indiana, and Utah joined the case, which was filed November 6 in federal court in Atlanta.
The companies neither admit nor deny the allegations in the proposed order, which still needs a judge's approval. A Progress spokesperson said its practices "have been transparent, fair, and consistent with industry practice." The complaint itself says most of the conduct happened under prior management and that new management has moved to fix the problems.
The heart of the case is the gap between the advertised rent and the actual bill. According to the complaint, Progress renters typically paid $30 to $330 or more a month above the price in the listing. That's $360 to $3,960 a year. Measured against the typical US rent of $1,932 in September 2026, from RentDataNow data built on the Zillow Observed Rent Index, it would add 1.6% to 17%.
Fee named in the complaint | Amount |
|---|---|
Smart home | $17 to $30 a month |
Utility management | $7.95 to $9.99 a month |
Air filter | $9.99 a month |
Pest control | $10 a month |
Resident benefit package | $15 a month |
Landscaping | $35 to $120 a month |
Septic tank | $40 a month |
Pool | $100 to $175 a month |
Renter's insurance exemption | $14.95 a month |
Lease administration | $125 at move-in |
The government's case goes well beyond fees. It alleges Progress advertised homes as move-in ready when many needed serious repairs or cleaning, and had a policy of using Photoshop to remove dirt from walls and carpets and to insert appliances in listing images. It also alleges the company routinely kept deposit money for normal wear and tear, preexisting conditions, and renovations, and that its contracts barred negative comments. In 2023, after learning Progress had failed to refund certain fees, the then-CEO told staff not to make changes, explaining, "I am not taking $1M impact to do the right thing," according to the complaint.
Of the settlement, $48.5 million goes to the FTC, which can use it for refunds to harmed renters. The other $1.25 million goes to Arizona for attorney's fees and costs. No refund process has been announced, and the FTC warns that it will never demand money or tell you to transfer money. Going forward, Progress would have to advertise the total monthly price, including all mandatory recurring fees, more prominently than any other price, and send itemized deposit statements within 30 days of move-out or sooner if state law requires.
The case matters beyond one company. About 24.5% of US renter households, or 11.3 million, live in detached single-family homes, according to the US Census Bureau. Invitation Homes, another large single-family landlord, agreed to pay $48 million in a similar FTC case in 2024, and the agency is exploring a rule that would require mandatory fees to be listed up front.
Until then, ask for the total monthly cost in writing before you pay an application or holding fee, and read every fee addendum in the lease. Photograph the home the day you move in. If you're fighting a deposit charge, see how to dispute a security deposit deduction, and for where the law is changing, the states cracking down on rental junk fees.
Sources
Federal Trade Commission press release (November 2026)
FTC case page, complaint and stipulated order, Civil Action 1:26-cv-06782-VMC, US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Gizmodo, for the company's statement
Reuters, via Devdiscourse, for the Invitation Homes case and the FTC's fee rule work
US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 1-year estimates, 2024, table B25032
RentDataNow national rent data, anchored to the Zillow Observed Rent Index, September 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Progress Residential paying $49.75 million?
The FTC and four states alleged Progress and owner Pretium Partners hid mandatory fees, misrepresented home conditions, and improperly kept security deposits. The companies agreed to settle while neither admitting nor denying the allegations. The order still needs court approval.
Will Progress Residential renters get refunds?
Possibly. The proposed order sends $48.5 million to the FTC, which can use it for refunds to harmed renters, but no refund process has been announced. The FTC says it will never demand money or ask you to transfer money.
What hidden fees did Progress Residential charge?
The complaint lists smart home fees of $17 to $30 a month, utility management fees of $7.95 to $9.99, landscaping fees of $35 to $120, and pool fees of $100 to $175, among others. Progress disputes the FTC's claims.
Related Rent Guides

California voters backed stronger rent protections in five of six cities
Salinas voters are keeping rent stabilization despite a 9-to-1 spending gap, and San Pablo is on track for a new 3% cap. Redwood C…

Man says ChatGPT told him to stop paying rent. He was evicted and is now suing OpenAI
A lawsuit filed in San Francisco claims ChatGPT assured a tenant he could stop paying rent and keep his apartment. He was evicted…

Six California cities vote on rent rules Tuesday, from new caps to an outright repeal
Redwood City and San Pablo could adopt strict new rent caps on Tuesday, Salinas could repeal its rent stabilization law, and Santa…
Henry Jo is a housing analyst covering rent data, affordability, city comparisons, and much more. He started following rental data while apartment hunting in two cities at once, and he lives in the Pacific Northwest.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.